Status Update for 2.0 and 1.6

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Saturday 30 December 2006 14:31, Bart Coppens wrote:
> On Saturday 30 December 2006 14:05, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > funny that compiling krita on solaris seems more complicated than on
> > Windows ;p
>
> I'm just guessing that because the function name starts with _, and there
> is no manpage for it ;)
>
> > yes but changing user interaction in a .x (x != 0) release seems wrong
> > to me. especially if it means using a hack that might introduce some new
> > regressions for the last revision.
>
> Agreed :(

Well, actually in this case changing the user interaction seems to me the 
right thing to do, if we can make it robust and dependable. People don't 
realize they can actually interact with the adj layer mask at the moment at 
all.

But stability should come first.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20061230/39d19422/attachment.pgp