LAB Channels type and Babel
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
ku.b at gmx.de
Fri Apr 21 12:03:27 CEST 2006
Hello all,
working on CinePaint on printing and grading integration, it was as well
my starting point to develop various colour management tools. They are
partitially available from my website.
My impression was allways to not make colour ranges as specific like
the ranges for channels among traditionalists and colour scientists.
Remember for Cmyk one need the 0...100 range for Lab it is even different
for two channels (L and a+b) including signdness, for XYZ and RGB is 0...1
to be expected.
Different ranges exist in different Lab encodings and bit depths. See the
ICC and Tiff specs. What makes sense from a traditionalists point of view
is pointless for imaging applications. The value ranges are inherited from
very device dependent workflows. I'd like to break with that and did
inside CinePaint.
Such Bable style ranges becomes unmaintainable, or at least hard to keep
in sync and are error proune. As well it introduces a certain overhead
for range conversions and checks. Possibly extra structures are needed to
keep everything in sync. I experienced such things in my early days.
Nearly every developer stepping in this matter is irritated by this.
Thats not good.
My suggestion is to
Keep it Simple.
Thus most errors will dissapear. The exeption comes with labeling, for
instance in a curve editor for various channel types. At least the curve
is allways applied the same to the channel data. Only the label must be
set appropriate.
When I start on the CMM code in Oyranos I will keep colour ranges
in the proposed simple model. The only exeption may be fixed point data.
Sorry if my post is a bit long for the first time. But the subject
is going a long way eighter.
kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
+ development for color management
+ imaging / panoramas
+ email: ku.b at gmx.de
+ http://www.behrmann.name
Am 21.04.06, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Casper Boemann:
> I did it like that originally, but adrian changed it, which fixed the
> display so somehow unsigned is right
>
> Adrian may be able to tell you more
>
> best regards
> Casper
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "BERGER Cyrille" <cberger at cberger.net>
> To: "Krayon (KImageShop)" <kimageshop at kde.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:43 AM
> Subject: LAB Channels type
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the LAB Channels type are wrong in krita. We declare all of
> > them as Q_UINT16, whereas L is Q_UINT16 but A and B are Q_INT16. I
> > don't know how much it is a problem, but I do think it's confusing not
> > to have the good definition.
> >
> > --
> > Cyrille Berger
> > _______________________________________________
> > kimageshop mailing list
> > kimageshop at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
> >
>
More information about the kimageshop
mailing list