adrian at pagenet.plus.com
Fri Mar 5 14:02:13 CET 2004
On Friday 05 March 2004 12:29 pm, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2004 13:17, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Didn't we do some translation of that in the brush loading? I seem to
> > remember coming across that code.
> Oh, wait -- you fixed that. Nice!
Yeah, the brushes give the same results as when they're used in gimp now,
using the default spacings.
> > Anyway -- a slider that moves from 1 to
> > 1000 is not really handy to use, so we should do something about that if
> > the range needs to stay 1-1000.
> I've committed a new version, one where the slider is 1-100, but the
> result gets multiplied by 10, so we stay in the right range. Maybe that's
I agree that 1000 is a large range for a small slider. Only problem with
dividing by 10 is that we lose resolution. Steps of 10% might be a bit too
much? See how it works in practice, I guess.
More information about the kimageshop