transform, selection, paintdevice and layer relations

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Tuesday 28 December 2004 20:14, Casper Boemann wrote:

> Next, selections should in my mind also be part of the paint device and not
> a layer. But for now we can live with that, just as long as we don't make
> any further steps towards relying on the layer, so that later on we can
> refactor it into the paint device if we can come up with a good design. I
> havn't thought this through, so maybe I'm wrong on this one.

Cyrille already moved the selection variable from the layer to the paint 
device, so that's done in HEAD.

Selections should probably stay a paint device in their own right, because 
that wins us a lot: all tools can work on selections, in principle, and it 
becomes easy to create previews for masks etc.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20041228/f03b1e59/attachment.pgp