IE compatibility - Madfox
Leo Savernik
l.savernik at aon.at
Tue Nov 22 19:08:43 CET 2005
Am Dienstag, 22. November 2005 16:04 schrieb Daniel Molkentin:
> > That's true, but we still don't emulate every quirks. Hence, we shouldn't
> > promise more than we can hold.
>
> Ok but:
>
> 1) User-Agent is a pretty technical name. Simple and understandable wording
> should be our goal.
Not in this case. Normal people shouldn't ever need this. This option is only
for technical people/developers who want to test the browser. Normal people
wouldn't ever find it because they had to scroll the icon view to get down to
the ua-icon.
> 2) At least to me, Emulation implies that someting tries to behave like
> something else and gets as close as possible, but not necessarily 100%.
For me, too. But I'm not a usability-target ;-)
mfg
Leo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/khtml-devel/attachments/20051122/e74b1038/attachment.pgp
More information about the Khtml-devel
mailing list