[Kget] [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
Thu Jun 6 20:26:17 UTC 2013
Hello,
all kopete repos were pushed to git.kde.org. I also enabled hooks
and development sites and configured trunk i18n branch.
When you delete kdenetwork from svn, can you delete also
playground and extragear kopete paths from svn? These are
converted in git too.
svn paths:
/trunk/playground/network/kopete/
/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/
/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-scripting/
new git projects:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdenetwork/kopete
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-pimpresence
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-scripting
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-sharemydesktop
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-thinklight
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-whiteboard
Plugins cryptography, smpppdcs, motionautoaway and javascript
are in main kopete repository.
On Thursday 06 June 2013 09:33:53 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> Looks good, thanks a lot! :)
>
> I have cherry-picked all standalone fixes into 4.10 branch.
> Everything should build now in master and 4.10 (except
> Kopete, which is not online yet).
>
> I have also update documentation_paths and get_paths in trunk
> and branch locally; I will commit these change once Kopete is
> also online.
>
> SVN is looked now, so we do not need to hurry with removing
> it. I can do that in some days.
>
> Bye
> urs
>
> On 2013-06-05 23:37, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > Urs,
> >
> > Ok, kdenetwork-filesharing, kdenetwork-strigi-analyzers,
> > kdnssd, kget, kppp, krdc and krfb pushed, tags pushed,
> > hooks enabled, i18n branches set in projects.kde.org [1]
> > settings, and they are enabled for development.
> > After kopete is migrated, will you replace the svn content
> > with a README file as that sysadmin mail said? rather than
> > me putting one in each app's folder.
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Pali Rohár
> > <pali.rohar at gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Kopete git conversion scripts on dewey started.
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 21:10:10 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> >>> Jeremy, I think you can push into the main repos. The kppp
> >>> thing looks like some SVN keyword. I think this change
> >>> doesn't hurt.
> >>>
> >>> Once you pushed into the main repos, you can can notify me
> >>> again. Then I will test also and cherry-pick the build
> >>> fixes into the 4.10 branch.
> >>>
> >>> @Pali: You can run the conversion for Kopete now also.
> >>>
> >>> @all: Please do not commit anything which is not related
> >>> to the conversion at this time!
> >>>
> >>> I have opened a sysadmin ticket for looking SVN repos
> >>> until Git repos on projects.kde.org [1] look okay and we
> >>> can remove them in SVN.
> >>>
> >>> Bye
> >>> urs
> >>>
> >>> On 2013-06-05 18:58, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> >>> > Hmm, actually looking deeper kcm_krfb in svn is an empty
> >>> > folder (not sure what it's for...)
> >>> >
> >>> > And the differences in kppp seem
> >>> > weird, http://paste.kde.org/759278/ [2] [2] but
> >>> > shouldn't affect anything from what I can see. so maybe
> >>> > we're good to go? should I push this into the main git
> >>> > repos and we can test there? Rerun the conversion if
> >>> > needed, etc.
> >>> >
> >>> > BR,
> >>> > Jeremy
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Jeremy Whiting
> >>> > <jpwhiting at kde.org>
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >> Urs,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I just ran a conversion, and cloned the result and
> >>> >> found two problems. One is krfb git repo doesn't have
> >>> >> kcm_krfb folder inside it. Looking at the
> >>> >> CMakeLists.txt it's not built anyway, but we need to
> >>> >> find out why it's not there at all imo.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The second problem is that kppp has many differences
> >>> >> between svn master and git master, not sure why, but
> >>> >> I'll look into it this evening. We need these to be
> >>> >> working and right before we remove from svn.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> thanks,
> >>> >> Jeremy
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
> >>> >>
> >>> >> <rakuco at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>> >>> Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org> writes:
> >>> >>>> kdenetwork will get migrated to Git in the next days
> >>> >>>> (between
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> June 5th
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> and June 11th). Please do not commit anything into
> >>> >>>> SVN anymore.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Also,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> please wait with any Git commits until further
> >>> >>>> notice.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Sorry if I've missed this being discussed somewhere
> >>> >>> else, but doesn't it
> >>> >>> make sense to ask the sysadmins to svn lock kdenetwork
> >>> >>> to prevent people
> >>> >>> from committing?
> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> >>> >>> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> >>> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
> >>> >>> [3]
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>> > Links:
> >>> > ------
> >>> > [1]
> >>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
> >>> > [3] [2] http://paste.kde.org/759278/ [2]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pali Rohár
> >> pali.rohar at gmail.com
> >
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1] http://projects.kde.org
> > [2] http://paste.kde.org/759278/
> > [3] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kget/attachments/20130606/720d4c64/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Kget
mailing list