[Kget] R: Re: KGet Maintainership

[nekkar at libero.it]

Sure you maintained it! ;) But I think now kget needs someone to take the lead 
of the project. Could that someone be you? ;)

Seems like there are at least 2 
bugs reports related to the postTransferChangedEvent function call. That 
function can be very dangerous,
since it trusts that the Observers that have 
been added to the handler, still exist. I would love to see some kind of 
unittests to look for potential problems
like this. Maybe something that gives 
tons of commands to kget like creating / deleting / pausing / redownloading / 
etc.. transfers and looking at the
final result.

:Dario


>----Messaggio 
originale----
>Da: l.appelhans at gmx.de
>Data: 07/08/2009 18.35
>A: 
"nekkar at libero.it"<nekkar at libero.it>
>Ogg: Re: [Kget] KGet Maintainership
>
>Am 
Freitag 07 August 2009 11:50:17 schrieb nekkar at libero.it:
>> Ehi guys.. Looking 
at the KGet project, I can see how I still appear as the
>> maintainer. I don't 
think it's correct since I think there are developers
>> way more active than 
me (yeah, more than 0 can be pretty easy  ;) ..).
>>
>> Anyway,
>> seriously, 
anyone would like to become/figure out like the new project
>> maintainer? 
Anyone would like to start this adventure, make kget the best
>> application 
ever and take over the world? :)
>Well we maintained it as a team in the last 
months, we could just continue 
>doing that. :)
>>
>> BTW, Yesterday I was 
looking at
>> the bug reported recently, and it seemed like some are really 
hard to
>> catch, unless we develop a series of unittests on the whole 
infrastracture
>> / gui. What do you think?
>+1
>I remember the model/timer 
bug, still don't really know what the reason is. :/
>
>Lukas
>>
>> Best 
regards,
>>     Dario
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
Kget mailing list
>> Kget at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kget

>