[Kget] kget BIG next changes

Manolo Valdes nolis71cu at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 23:25:24 CET 2007

El Martes 20 Febrero 2007 4:12 PM, Urs Wolfer escribió:
> Hi
> Manolo, what's about you? Do you feel ready to do the work described by
> Dario? I think you have done quite a lot regarding the transferplugin
> work... Would be nice!
> Bye
> urs

Hi Urs

Well , I just have some simples ideas about what Dario described.
But in order to make metalink stuf work property. we need at least some 
initial changes in the way kget handle the transfers now.
as i said in the last mail. i have some ideas to do it but i really like that 
Dario lead us about it. because i dont want to spend time in something that 
he already have figured out.

may be an IRC meeting can solve the problem :)
but i dont know about Dario. i did'nt recieve ant reply from him :(

> On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Manolo Valdes wrote:
> > El Domingo 07 Enero 2007 4:36 PM, Dario Massarin escribió:
> >
> > Hi Guys :)
> >
> > I'm trying to make the metalink pluging operational but. it seems to need
> > the "kget  BIG next changes" that Dario point :)
> >
> > So Dario I really need some framework to work around. at least  "....A
> > container transfer is a transfer that can own other transfers....."
> > you said that you have it figured out.
> > I have some ideas but it would be great to see and implement yours :)
> >
> > best regards
> > Manolito

More information about the Kget mailing list