[Kget] transfer status

[Dario Massarin]

> I'd suggest to provide just one (protected) change function that emits the  
> signal. If necessary the signal could be suppressed depending on an optional  
> boolean parameter at the end. I also don't see why the transfer change has to  
> be so fine grained to report the kind of change. 
 
Ok. I agree.  
 
> Second point: 
<snip...>  
 
These are all valid points. Now I don't have the time to answer to all you questions. 
(The computer laboratory in my university is closing...) 
 
I am really very happy about the problems you are noticing in the Transer class. Really!  
I expected this to bappen. 
Since I am now planning to redesign this class, why don't you take maintenance over it? Obviously we have to 
discuss a lot about it, and all the valid points you've just raised must be resolved.  
Tomorrow, I will send you a mail with all my new ideas. 
My time is over :-( 
 
Bye! 
	Dario 



____________________________________________________________
Navighi a 2 MEGA e i primi 3 mesi sono GRATIS. 
Scegli Libero Adsl Flat senza limiti su http://www.libero.it