D13813: Make this test work again with new uds implementation
Albert Astals Cid
noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Tue Jul 3 23:00:23 BST 2018
aacid added a subscriber: dfaure.
aacid added a comment.
In D13813#286358 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D13813#286358>, @jtamate wrote:
> In D13813#286313 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D13813#286313>, @aacid wrote:
>
> > Did we break how KIO works and we're now going after the users of KIO and fixing them or was this a "bad usage" from starters that worked by chance?
>
>
> We break how KIO works and we're now going after the users of KIO and fixing them.
> uds insert() is now only for insert, replace() is for insert or update. Since https://phabricator.kde.org/D12696
@dfaure Are you aware we broke KIO backwards compatibility? Seems like we threw out of the window our compatibility promises for our of most important frameworks and really I don't understand why we did that in the sake of performance. If the performance boost was so great we could have introduced V2 classes and make people start using them, but breaking people's code seems really bad to me :/
REPOSITORY
R318 Dolphin
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D13813
To: jtamate, #dolphin, #frameworks, elvisangelaccio
Cc: dfaure, aacid, ngraham, bruns, elvisangelaccio, kfm-devel, spoorun, navarromorales, isidorov, firef, andrebarros, emmanuelp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20180703/dee963e5/attachment.htm>
More information about the kfm-devel
mailing list