Review Request: Bug 303875 - 'Tags' properties with different font color in tooltip widget
Frank Reininghaus
frank78ac at googlemail.com
Fri Jan 11 20:26:49 GMT 2013
> On Jan. 11, 2013, 7:22 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > This seems fine to me, but I cannot really give it a "Ship it" as I'm not too sure if this is the correct way of doing it. Perhaps you could add the dolphin / some-other group. Someone who knows has experience with widgets?
It does look good to me, but I just asked Christoph, who handled the bug report in the first place, to have a look (I'm not that familiar with color handling stuff either). Thanks Emmanuel for taking care of all these small bugs - you are really making the KDE 4.10 user experience better :-)
- Frank
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108335/#review25256
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 11, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Emmanuel Pescosta wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108335/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 11, 2013, 7:24 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Dolphin, Nepomuk and Frank Reininghaus.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Use right foreground role in Nepomuk2::TagCheckBox::m_label
>
>
> This addresses bug 303875.
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303875
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> ui/tagcheckbox.cpp 7e402c2
> ui/tagwidget.cpp 5d1ef1c
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108335/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Done. Screenshot attached
>
>
> Screenshots
> -----------
>
> Old and new look (screenshot includes also the html tags patch)
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108335/s/1020/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel Pescosta
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20130111/c64637a9/attachment.htm>
More information about the kfm-devel
mailing list