Bug #66958

[Simon St James]

On Thursday 11 January 2007 07:55, Germain Garand wrote:
> yes, but the member name you chose in the previous patch (softReload) is
> better IMO.
> What we want is two different level of depth for reloading ; wether the
> user initiated the reload isn't and shouldn't be relevant.
> (a software-induced "soft" reload should be able to not reset frames, and
> conversely, if we introduce a shift-something "hard" reload behaviour, it
> will have to reset frames even though initiated by user)

I agree; for my purposes too (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121993) I 
would prefer a distinction between a "soft"/ "normal" reload (F5) and 
a "hard" one (Shift+F5).

Best Wishes,
Simon