AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: making fallback access keys configurable

[Tobias Anton]

Hey! I've been using KMail for a long time, until the IOSlave started dying
on me during message transfer because KMail couldn't cope with one folder
containing > 400.000 mails (which was kde-cvs and bugs-dist, btw.) and thus
became too slow sorting in the incoming messages, resulting in the timeout.

ATM I'm testing how many emails Outlook can take until it barfs ;-)

Cheers
Tobias

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Charles Samuels [mailto:charles at kde.org] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mلrz 2006 21:44
An: kfm-devel at kde.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: making fallback access keys
configurable

Aaron J. Seigo wrote, on Thursday 2006 March 02 2:33 pm:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 04:52, Tobias Anton wrote:
> >  Wrong answer. If they learned a shortcut they will most probably refuse
> > to learn another but rather switch the desktop system. Unnecessary
> > removal of
>
> versus the people who switch or, worse, never use our software because the
> current state usability. =)

We've removed plenty of little things users have gotten used to that don't 
affect usability. This one definitely does, so where does the sudden refusal

to do something about it come from?

How many people actually use access keys in konqueror anyway?

I certainly never have. Except by accident.

cs

P.S., Tobias Anton uses outlook. I propose a witchhunt. :)