Interesting thing with DNS requests

[Thiago Macieira]

Fredrik Johansson wrote:
>I thought there must be something quite wrong somewere, so I started to
> watch the IO traffic through eth0 using wireshark. And the result was
> very different on the DNS requests, the HTTP was about the same.
>
>konqueror:	656 DNS packets 		479 HTTP packets
>Firefox:		42 DNS packets		442 HTTP packets
>
>I dont know if I have set up something in a wrong way (upgraded from
> Dapper) or if I dont understand the info I retrived.
>
>Oh and I have keep cache in sync setting in both browsers
>
>The wireshark captures are here:
> http://mumme.se/wireshark_capture.tar.gz
>
>Can anybody else confirm/not confirm the above? I don't want to  post a
> bug ticket if the error is my side.

Don't post a bug ticket about DNS problems there because I won't do 
anything about it. It's not a bug. DNS servers are supposed to reply 
fast. 

If you don't have a fast DNS server available, install a caching 
nameserver like nscd.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20061207/c298e0cf/attachment.sig>