XUL Support in Konqueror

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

On Monday 27 June 2005 00:30, Philip Scott wrote:
> - Embedding directly into khtml
>
>   pros:	tight integration
> 	probably quickest
>   cons:	full XUL applications will need the complete khtml part
> 	khtml bloat
> 	harder to implement
>
> Any other suggestions or ideas? Pros or cons?? Complete redesigns? :) Speak
> now or forever hold your peace ;)
>
This is the only real option. You just have to take care in your 
implementation of to keep your implementation clean and isolated in KHTML. 

It might be easier and more elegant to do in KDOM and KHTML2. When you know 
what the implementation needs you can discuss it on ksvg-devel.

Btw. WebCore has a thing call Flex-boxes that I have heard referred to as an 
implementation of the XUL box-model, so you might also need that at some 
point.

`Allan