XUL Support in Konqueror

[John Tapsell]

Hey Philip!

  How are you doing?  Don't hesitate to ask if you run into any problems!
We haven't heard from you for a while now - don't suffer in silence :)


JohnFlux



On Sunday 26 June 2005 23:30, Philip Scott wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just to say hi - I am your newest recruit, courtesy of Google - I intend to
> give Konqueror XUL support. I am not that familiar with khtml, or the
> Konqueror code-bases, so I thought before I dived in the deep-end, I would
> solicit a few opinions...
>
> There are two main approaches, as far as I can see
>
> - An XUL kpart
>   pros: reusable
>  can be used independantly of Konqui
>  saves me having to get my head around khtml ;)
>  can make use of Georges existing work with KaXUL
>   cons: what about XUL embedded in web pages
>  performance issues with lots of XSL transformations
>
> - Embedding directly into khtml
>
>   pros: tight integration
>  probably quickest
>   cons: full XUL applications will need the complete khtml part
>  khtml bloat
>  harder to implement
>
> Any other suggestions or ideas? Pros or cons?? Complete redesigns? :) Speak
> now or forever hold your peace ;)
>
> Regards,