PATCH - HTTP NTLM Authentication

[Daniel Molkentin]

On Wednesday, 22. September 2004 12:14, Leo Savernik wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 22. September 2004 02:10 schrieb Karsten Künne:
>> I while ago I posted a message saying that I don't intend to support NTLM.
>> Well, after I discovered libntlm I changed my mind :-).
>
>Is it necessary to introduce another compile time requirement?

Yes, libntlm would also be useful for kmail (yes I know, other module, but 
still). We have to live with the fact that there is still a lot of Exchange- 
and Internet Information Servers out there where administrators disable 
everything but NTLM. And you don't want to maintain a fork, do you?

Cheers,
  Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20040922/9fa4aa91/attachment.sig>