Is it okay to spoof navigator.product by default?

[Leo Savernik]

Am Dienstag, 21. September 2004 19:30 schrieb Allan Sandfeld Jensen:
> Personally I only see one problem with this patch; in that it would be a
> better  solution to fix KHTML, so it again supports the Netscape4 ecma-code
> like it  did in the 3.1.x series (this bug is regression). I just dont have
> the skills, and I can't  see anyone else caring.

Netscape4 ecma-code? Can you elaborate, please?

mfg
 Leo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20040922/4038a6cf/attachment.sig>