Konqueror's user agent string (again)
Roland Seuhs
roland at hasos.com
Sat Aug 17 07:37:57 BST 2002
Hi!
In current CVS, Konqueror identifies as Konqueror/3.0 again, please change it
back to Konqueror/3
If you look at browser statistics (I've found
http://www.zyn.de/htstats/usage_200208.html#TOPAGENTS on the web as an
example) you see that several Konqueror versions are in the statistics on
lower ranks.
Because most sites monitor only the first 15 or 10 browsers, Konqueror doesn't
even show up in most statistics, and with KDE .x versions coming out every
couple of months will never have a chance to get in. Also, with KDE becoming
more mature, people will upgrade less often, which will make it even harder
for a single Konqueror-version to enter the top-10.
If Konqueror would only send the major version number ("Konqueror 3" instead
of "Konqueror 3.x.y") I think it will get into a lot more browser stats and
it will be more likely that the webmaster tests the site against Konqueror and
not lock out Konqueror. I
think it will also be more likely for Konqueror to get out of the
"others"-category of the big statistics-sites like
http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm
If you currently write to a webmaster about a problem on the site, the
webmaster will most likely respond (if at all) "never heard of Konqueror" -
But if Konqueror makes it into the top-10, the webmaster at least has heard
of it and will be more open to complaints (like lock-out pages), even if
he doesn't have a Unix-box to run it himself.
And this would benefit all users of Konqueror because those lock-out pages are
the single most annoying problem of Konqueror, even with all the user-agent
faking functionality. (At least that's my opinion)
Thanks for listening,
Roland
--
Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else.
More information about the kfm-devel
mailing list