kdevelop will mislead the user that the macro has not been defined when the macro is defined in CXXFLAGS

[shine]

Dear All:
when one macro is defined in CXXFLAGS, kdevelop will mislead the user that the macro has not been defined.
I think that KDevelop, as a tool,  should either do the right thing or just don't do the wrong thing to mislead the user. This is a quite serious problem. 

Will this problem be resolved in fulture, anyone knows it?


below is an example, in which MACRO_IN_MK is defined by adding parameter -DMACRO_IN_MK  to CXXFLAGS.
Has anyone noticed this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop/attachments/20130905/411054be/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 551B3E33 at 70E2C44B.9E742852.png
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 85938 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop/attachments/20130905/411054be/attachment.obj>