Gideon and the KDE 3.1 release

[Boris Gorelik]

well, I think that it's a good idea to wait untill gideon is stable and 
release it independently first, and then include it with 3.2 release.
This way one can download the whole 3.1 release and do rpm -Uph *.rpm (or 
something like this) and be sure that every package he gets is stable and 
(relatively) bug-free.
Another option would be to include both: last KDEvelop release and Gideon.

On Monday 28 October 2002 14:34, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> As the 3.1 release draws close, we need to decide the direction we'd like
> to go with Gideon.  Right now, the code seems pretty stable but as everyone
> is noting a lot of bugs are being filed.  Do we want to try to sync a
> release to the KDE 3.1, or use this time to stabilize everything and
> perhaps make it synced to 3.2?
>
> I would rather wait until 3.2.
>
> Feedback; thoughts?
>
> Caleb
>
>
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body: unsubscribe
> »your-email-address«

-- 
Boris Gorelik
Tue, 29/Oct/2002, 23 Heshvan 5763
-------------------------------------------------
! Molecular Modelling Group !
! Pharmacy School, Hadassa Faculty of medicine !
! The Hebrew University of Jerusalem !
! http://www.md.huji.ac.il/models/group.html !
!
!------------------------------------------------


-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«