I give up! Help!

Rick Moore lrmoore at home.com
Tue Sep 28 16:54:45 BST 1999


Interesting.  At the risk of sounding like a complete moron, how do I check the full rev level?  "ls -la" only shows the ".2".

Rick

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: holle at almaden.ibm.com 
  To: kdevelop at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de 
  Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 10:26 AM
  Subject: Re: I give up! Help!




  Have you installed the "new" libstdc++ which actually came with the compilers
  source code ? I got a static library called /usr/lib/libstdc++.a.2.10.0 after
  "make install" in the gcc-2.95.1 main directory. This seems to be default to
  link, though I do still have the old libstdc++-.so.2.9.0 with proper links
  flying around. THis library (2.10.0) should have been compiled by the new
  compiler (I hope, at least) and should work ok with gcc-2.95.1

  - holger

  "Rick Moore" <lrmoore at home.com> on 24/09/99 21:16:34

  Please respond to kdevelop at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de

  To:   kdevelop at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
  cc:
  Subject:  I give up!  Help!




  I've searched the mail archive, and I'm astonished that I'm the only one with
  this problem.  Please save me from a life cursed with vi.  Your product looks
  awesome, and I'd really like to get it working.

  I've tried gcc 2.95 (latest release), egcs 1.1.?, gcc 2.7.x, and gcc 2.8.1.  All
  of them crap out at various points trying to compile the source code.  >From my
  searches on the mail list, it sounds like you all have 2.95.1 working so I'll
  concentrate on that one.  I'm running a fresh install of FreeBSD 3.2.  I've
  confirmed the revision levels of gmake, autoinstall, flex, etc.  The ./configure
  line is "./configure --prefix=/usr/local
  --with-extra-includes=/usr/include/g++".

  Is there anything else I can tell you that might help diagnose the problem?  I'm
  still somewhat naive to the ways of the open source community, so it could just
  be something stupid.

  The compiler output is as follows:

  g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/include
  -I/usr/X11R6/include/X11/qt  -I/usr/include/g++ -I/usr/X11R6/include
  -O2 -Wall -c ClassParser.cc
  In file included from /usr/include/g++/iostream.h:31,
                   from ClassParser.cc:20:
  /usr/include/g++/streambuf.h:394: invalid type `void *' for default argument to
  `ios *'
  /usr/include/g++/streambuf.h: In method `ios::~ios()':
  /usr/include/g++/streambuf.h:472: warning: `void *' is not a pointer-to-object
  type
  In file included from ClassParser.cc:20:
  /usr/include/g++/iostream.h: At top level:
  /usr/include/g++/iostream.h:50: invalid type `void *' for default argument to
  `ostream *'
  /usr/include/g++/iostream.h:117: invalid type `void *' for default argument to
  `ostream *'
  /usr/include/g++/iostream.h:221: invalid type `void *' for default argument to
  `ostream *'
  In file included from ParsedContainer.h:191,
                   from ParsedClassContainer.h:22,
                   from ClassStore.h:21,
                   from ClassParser.h:27,
                   from ClassParser.cc:24:
  ParsedStruct.h: In method `const char *
  CParsedStruct::asPersistantString(QString &)':
  ParsedStruct.h:44: ANSI C++ forbids implicit conversion from `void *' in return
  In file included from ClassParser.cc:24:
  ClassParser.h: At top level:
  ClassParser.h:74: invalid type `void *' for default argument to `const char *'
  ClassParser.cc: In method `class CParsedAttribute *
  CClassParser::parseVariable()':
  ClassParser.cc:582: ANSI C++ forbids implicit conversion from `void *' in
  initialization
  ClassParser.cc: In method `class CParsedMethod *
  CClassParser::parseMethodDeclaration()':
  ClassParser.cc:804: ANSI C++ forbids implicit conversion from `void *' in
  assignment
  ClassParser.cc: In method `class CParsedClass *
  CClassParser::parseClassHeader()':
  ClassParser.cc:1124: ANSI C++ forbids implicit conversion from `void *' in
  assignment

  ...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop/attachments/19990928/5f67a9d4/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop mailing list