running different version from its build directory?

[Kevin Funk]

On Saturday, 28 September 2019 13:33:31 CEST René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Kevin Funk wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > I'm not sure what's the problem with the traditional way of installing
> > KDevelop into a separate prefix (-> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=...), setting
> > up
> > PATH/QT_PLUGIN_PATH/LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH on macOS) and
> > running the specific kdevelop binary then? That always worked fine.
> 
> Nothing wrong, probably, I just didn't think of that. I build with full
> rpath info on Linux (it's the default on Mac) so I shouldn't have to set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I'd have to figure out how to let Qt look for plugins in
> an additional directory though.

Hint: QT_PLUGIN_PATH

Regards,
Kevin

> R.


-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20190928/e725c128/attachment.sig>