CI system maintainability

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:35:37 CET Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 10:32:39 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto:
> > OK, to be fair not 100% today's situation because of the above. It was
> > based on best judgment maybe we're missing such a set of guidelines. I
> > admit I'm slightly doubtful though.
> 
> I can't claim it may work 100%, but I've seen other communities (many, many
> years ago) where a "semi anarchy" replaced by "iron-gripped rules" from one
> day to another actually killed them.

I wouldn't call that iron grip from one day to the other though. It's not like 
we've not been working toward mandatory review for the past ten years or so. 
Most KDE projects de facto apply mandatory reviews AFAICT.

Regards.
-- 
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20190328/20e39663/attachment-0001.sig>