D15694: Make implicit fallthroughs a compiler error, remove unneeded breaks

[René J.V. Bertin]

rjvbb added a comment.


  >   You can use comments <https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/03/10/wimplicit-fallthrough-in-gcc-7/>, or `__attribute__((fallthrough))` in C. 
  
  That's strange decision if you ask me. I mean, if you're going to make the switch statement skeleton different for C and C++ (with a new keyword that's not available in both), why not renew it completely and rename it? I'd expect current (C++) compilers to be able to generate efficient code for a larger number of (const) variable types than the types one can use now. Strings for instance - like in that "looks like a switch" piece of code that got me involved here :)

REPOSITORY
  R32 KDevelop

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D15694

To: aaronpuchert, #kdevelop, mssola, brauch
Cc: rjvbb, brauch, mssola, kossebau, kdevelop-devel, glebaccon, antismap, iodelay, vbspam, geetamc, Pilzschaf, akshaydeo, surgenight, arrowd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20180927/69c47d40/attachment.html>