D12746: KDevelop: alternative monolithic storage options for TopDUContexts (PoC)

René J.V. Bertin noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Wed Nov 14 15:56:57 GMT 2018


rjvbb updated this revision to Diff 45462.
rjvbb added a comment.


  Patch cleaned up, stripped the LevelDB and Kyoto backends that never satisfied me.
  I did leave the original file-based storage backend, not because I think it has to be preserved if this ever gets in but to provide a quicker way to compare performance (and behaviour if ever someone testing this runs into issues).

CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D12746?vs=38266&id=45462

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D12746

AFFECTED FILES
  kdevplatform/language/CMakeLists.txt
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/CMakeLists.txt
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/test_topcontextstore.cpp
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/test_topcontextstore.h
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/test_topcontextstore.qrc
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/topcontextdata.base64
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata.cpp
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata.h
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata_p.cpp
  kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata_p.h

To: rjvbb, brauch
Cc: mwolff, kdevelop-devel, glebaccon, antismap, iodelay, vbspam, geetamc, Pilzschaf, akshaydeo, surgenight, arrowd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20181114/3e93ca34/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list