D12746: KDevelop: alternative monolithic storage options for TopDUContexts (PoC)
René J.V. Bertin
noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Wed Nov 14 15:56:57 GMT 2018
rjvbb updated this revision to Diff 45462.
rjvbb added a comment.
Patch cleaned up, stripped the LevelDB and Kyoto backends that never satisfied me.
I did leave the original file-based storage backend, not because I think it has to be preserved if this ever gets in but to provide a quicker way to compare performance (and behaviour if ever someone testing this runs into issues).
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D12746?vs=38266&id=45462
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D12746
AFFECTED FILES
kdevplatform/language/CMakeLists.txt
kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/CMakeLists.txt
kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/test_topcontextstore.cpp
kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/test_topcontextstore.h
kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/test_topcontextstore.qrc
kdevplatform/language/duchain/tests/topcontextdata.base64
kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata.cpp
kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata.h
kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata_p.cpp
kdevplatform/language/duchain/topducontextdynamicdata_p.h
To: rjvbb, brauch
Cc: mwolff, kdevelop-devel, glebaccon, antismap, iodelay, vbspam, geetamc, Pilzschaf, akshaydeo, surgenight, arrowd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20181114/3e93ca34/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list