D7995: KDevelop: address dirwatching inefficiency (WIP/PoC)

[René J.V. Bertin]

rjvbb added a comment.


  Yeah, and I'm using it on such a platform because I can no longer remain on 5.1 if I want to keep up with development ... 
  I don't mind if this gets committed to master, as long as I can develop and test against the branch I'm using (and preferably, if any smaller, preparatory changes that don't affect the current behaviour *can* be committed in 5.2 too).

REPOSITORY
  R32 KDevelop

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D7995

To: rjvbb, #kdevelop, mwolff
Cc: aaronpuchert, arrowdodger, kfunk, dfaure, mwolff, brauch, kdevelop-devel, geetamc, Pilzschaf, akshaydeo, surgenight
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20170928/e7dda3be/attachment-0001.html>