kdereview

[Kevin Funk]

On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 09:10:07 CEST Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 07:42:25 CEST Morten Volden wrote:
> > Hi All
> > 
> > Just wanted to hear thoughts or comments before I reply to Allen.
> > 
> > kdev-perforce has recently been moved to kdevplatform.
> > 
> > I would at some point like to remove the repo entirely, but since there
> 
> has
> 
> > not been a release of KDevelop with the plug-in yet, I guess it is a
> 
> little
> 
> > premature to do that at the moment.
> > 
> > So I guess the appropriate steps would be to:
> > 
> > 1) Get the repo moved from review (Since it has been included in
> > kdevplatform I consider that as passing review - no? )
> 
> Is it worth the hassle moving it over? /me thinks it's not.
> 
> > 2) Add something to the read-me to make users aware that the plug-in has
> > moved
> 
> Yes, that makes sense. Feel free to delete contents in master and place a
> README that points you to kdevelop.git. See what we did in kdev-qmljs.git
> for instance.

Err, kdevplatform.git...

> (snip)

-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20160920/66e0e594/attachment-0001.sig>