kdereview

[Kevin Funk]

On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 09:10:07 CEST Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 07:42:25 CEST Morten Volden wrote:
> > Hi All
> > 
> > Just wanted to hear thoughts or comments before I reply to Allen.
> > 
> > kdev-perforce has recently been moved to kdevplatform.
> > 
> > I would at some point like to remove the repo entirely, but since there
> 
> has
> 
> > not been a release of KDevelop with the plug-in yet, I guess it is a
> 
> little
> 
> > premature to do that at the moment.
> > 
> > So I guess the appropriate steps would be to:
> > 
> > 1) Get the repo moved from review (Since it has been included in
> > kdevplatform I consider that as passing review - no? )
> 
> Is it worth the hassle moving it over? /me thinks it's not.
> 
> > 2) Add something to the read-me to make users aware that the plug-in has
> > moved
> 
> Yes, that makes sense. Feel free to delete contents in master and place a
> README that points you to kdevelop.git. See what we did in kdev-qmljs.git
> for instance.

I did this now:

kdev-perforce master got pruned.
kdev-perforce 5.0 got the state of master before the prune.

kde-build-metadata.git updated to reflect this.

Cheers,
Kevin

> I'd make sure the 5.0 branch of kdev-perforce is buildable against
> kdevplatform 5.0.
> 
> > 3) Wait for the plug-in to be included in an official release ( 5.1.x
> > perhaps? ).
> > 4) Close/remove the repo.
> 
> Yep, but we can already do so now, just make sure the 5.0 branch is still
> useful.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kevin
> 
> > //Morten
> > 
> > 2016-09-18 20:08 GMT+04:00 Allen Winter <winter at kde.org>:
> > > Howdy,
> > > 
> > > there's some stuff that's been in kdereview for a long time.
> > > 
> > > according to kde_projects.xml, the kdereview programs are:
> > >   bodega-client (at least since Dec 2013)
> > >   kdev-perforce
> > >   kdots (at least since Nov 2015)
> > >   kor (at least since Oct 2014)
> > >   kpeg
> > >   kwave
> > > 
> > > some of these (eg kwave) are actively developed.
> > > 
> > > Can the owners of these please move them to a final location,
> > > clean them out, or let me know if they are really still under review?
> > > 
> > > And by "move" I mean change their virtual location according to
> > > kde_projects
> > > or whatever "moving" means these days.
> > > 
> > > -Allen


-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20161008/81a0413c/attachment.sig>