Fix unit tests! [was: Re: KDevelop 5]

[Kevin Funk]

On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 12:27:35 AM CEST Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hey people,
> 
> I think we should aim to do a 5.0 release real soon, we have been
> pushing that away for far too long imo. I think KDevelop 5 is working
> mostly fine right now, with the possible exception of the assistants and
> a few feature-regressions in the C++ plugin (code completion is just not
> as good as it used to be). Then again, the parsing is so much better now
> that it's most likely still a good deal for the users compared to 4.7.
> 
> I would in fact suggest to merge the assistantpopup-ng branch, submit a
> few pending reviews, and call it done for 5.0. Yeah, the code assistants
> (esp. adapt signature) have a lot of issues, but at least they're not
> getting in the way any more with that branch. Maybe the 5.0 release even
> wins us a few people who are happy to look into that? ;)
> I'd just prefer having 5.0 now and 5.1 in two months a lot over having
> 5.0 in two months.

In preparation for a final KDevelop 5.0 release:

Please help fixing the unit tests (around 6 tests fail for 
kdevelop-5.0_stable-kf5-qt5, one failure left for kdevplatform-5.0_stable-kf5-
qt5).

I can't reproduce the problem with kdevplatform's test_uicontroller on my 
machine.

https://build.kde.org/view/Kdevelop/ <- Bookmark!

Regards,
Kevin

> What do you think?
> 
> Best,
> Sven


-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20160713/e9a98155/attachment.sig>