kdev vs kdevelop

[Milian Wolff]

On Dienstag, 12. Januar 2016 02:11:53 CET Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Alexander Zhigalin
> 
> <alexander at zhigalin.tk> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > Actually we have some naming inconsistency:
> > Sometimes plugins are called kdev-*, sometimes kdevelop-*, package names
> > are not corresponding to actual plugin names...
> > For example, kdev-php is being packaged as kdevelop-php, while pg-qt has
> > got the full name both in the repository and packages.
> > Should we establish a naming convention?
> > (I think it's better to have a full name)
> 
> I would say the convention is always using kdev-*. kdevelop-pg-qt is a
> special beast. I don't think anyone would mind renaming it to
> kdev-pg-qt, although I'm not sure anyone would become substantially
> happier.

+1

-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20160113/185d59d9/attachment.sig>