Review Request 125783: Language Support: add gnu99 and gnu11 standards options
Alexandre Courbot
gnurou at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 02:13:12 UTC 2015
> On Oct. 25, 2015, 11:18 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Is that everything that's needed?
Yes - parsing of kernel projects (Linux itself, but also out-of-tree drivers like Nouveau) has *dramatically* improved since the switch to CLang. Only the GNU extensions were still raising errors, but with the addition of these we are now reaching perfection. This is just amazing.
- Alexandre
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125783/#review87389
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Oct. 25, 2015, 4:07 a.m., Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125783/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 25, 2015, 4:07 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Repository: kdevelop
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> These standards are useful for parsing popular projects like the Linux
> Kernel, so let's propose them as well!
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> languages/plugins/custom-definesandincludes/kcm_widget/parserwidget.ui a9790fa11679451aa2c3e27fef02a29fe6d30d37
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125783/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Kernel macros like container_of() and others that use the typeof builtin parsed successfully with gnu99, but raised parsing errors with c99.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexandre Courbot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20151026/06b14ee2/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list