GSOC2015 KDevelop ideas

Kevin Funk kfunk at kde.org
Thu Mar 12 08:11:21 UTC 2015


On Thursday 12 March 2015 01:29:06 Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Laszlo Kis-Adam <dfighter1985 at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > Here's the patch to do that:
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122905/
> > 
> > I've also made some blog posts about my experiences:
> > https://dfighter1985.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/upgrading-kdevelops-valgrind
> > -plugin-to-kf5/
> > https://dfighter1985.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/kdevelop-plugins-debug-less
> > ons-learned/
> > https://dfighter1985.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/kdev-valgrind-at-work/
> > 
> > I have some further ideas for the plugin btw:
> > * Memcheck output should show both the line that deleted the block, and
> > the
> > line of the invalid read/write.
> > * Helgrind could also be integrated, as that's a quite useful tool as
> > well.
> > * Callgrind output could show the number of calls.
> > 
> > On 3/7/2015 16:56, Kevin Funk wrote:
> >> Regarding starting points: I'm already having something in mind that you
> >> could work on: kdev-valgrind isn't even ported to KF5 yet, and it'd be a
> >> great starter task to get that ready for KF5-based KDevelop. You could
> >> check the git logs of kdev-cppcheck to learn how to do that.
> >> ps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > KDevelop-devel mailing list
> > KDevelop-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
> 
> Good work, Laszlo.
> 
> You are definitely on the right track.
> 
> With regard to what you are proposing, I think these points you
> propose are interesting indeed and I'd like to see them developed.
> Furthermore, it will be interesting if you can explain what's your
> vision on how the user will be triggering and interacting with these
> tools.
> 
> Cheers!
> Aleix

Yep. It's also cool to see you blogging about your work right away!

Public exposure is good, and helps getting other people started on jobs like 
this. Even if it's just to show potential users that kdev-valgrind or one of 
the other tools exist, and to remind them they are usable.

Like Aleix, I'd like to see some kind of road map of your plans, once you've 
got a full overview over the tools and their issues, etc.

Thanks


> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel

-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20150312/00315a59/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list