QML 1 usage in KDevelop

[Alexander Richardson]

>>
>> But I write this mail more because QML 1 is "dead" and should not be used
>> anymore. The welcome page we could easily port to QML 2, I guess. But I'm not
>> so sure about the assistant popup - does the current QML1 code rely on the
>> "good" interaction between QML1 and Qt Widgets? Or should it be easy to port
>> it as well?
>
> It should be easy to port, I remember even looking into porting it,
> but back then QQuickWidget wasn't too stable and decided to hold it.
> Now it should be better.
> I agree it's something to look into sooner rather than later.
>

I have a WIP patch, but not sure whether it works properly since I did
this just to get it to compile on my system without qtquick1.

Alex
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qtquick2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20150713/1f8c5a41/attachment.bin>