Review Request 122147: Suggestion: Remove ClangIndex's tu import stash

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Mon Jan 19 15:54:06 UTC 2015


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122147/#review74339
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Milian Wolff


On Jan. 19, 2015, 1:59 p.m., Olivier Jean de Gaalon wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122147/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 19, 2015, 1:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop, Kevin Funk and Milian Wolff.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdev-clang
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This should simpler, faster, and not duplicate TopDuContext::indexedRecursiveImports.
> 
> The downside would be restarting the parsejob if the TU isn't right (exception case)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   clangparsejob.cpp d540500 
>   duchain/clangindex.h 47b854b 
>   duchain/clangindex.cpp 118b210 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122147/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> It probably compiles
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Olivier Jean de Gaalon
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20150119/23c1727f/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list