Review Request 122147: Suggestion: Remove ClangIndex's tu import stash
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Mon Jan 19 15:54:06 UTC 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122147/#review74339
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Milian Wolff
On Jan. 19, 2015, 1:59 p.m., Olivier Jean de Gaalon wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122147/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 19, 2015, 1:59 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop, Kevin Funk and Milian Wolff.
>
>
> Repository: kdev-clang
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This should simpler, faster, and not duplicate TopDuContext::indexedRecursiveImports.
>
> The downside would be restarting the parsejob if the TU isn't right (exception case)
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> clangparsejob.cpp d540500
> duchain/clangindex.h 47b854b
> duchain/clangindex.cpp 118b210
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122147/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> It probably compiles
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olivier Jean de Gaalon
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20150119/23c1727f/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list