Review Request 123191: Show more of the backtrace of the found problems. Also show the auxiliary backtrace ( source of the problem )

[Laszlo Kis-Adam]

> On March 31, 2015, 8:03 a.m., Kevin Funk wrote:
> > We need to make it clear where those two backtraces come from, otherwise it might be confusing.
> > 
> > Maybe show the "Invalid read at ...", and "Address 0x0 stack'd by ..." messages in the listing, too?
> 
> Laszlo Kis-Adam wrote:
>     OK, I'll do it.

Better this way?
http://www.picbutler.de/bild/321368/20150401000002316kh1at.jpg


- Laszlo


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123191/#review78264
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 1, 2015, 2:59 a.m., Laszlo Kis-Adam wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123191/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2015, 2:59 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdev-valgrind
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Show more of the backtrace of the found problems. Also show the auxiliary backtrace ( source of the problem )
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   marks.cpp 9adca2b 
>   models/memcheckitemsimpl.h b6d7a96 
>   models/memcheckitemsimpl.cpp 1b50b96 
>   models/memcheckmodel.cpp ad42605 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123191/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> * built
> * installed
> * it works as intended.
> 
> Take a look at the difference:
> Before:
> http://www.picbutler.de/bild/321320/20150331000002312k3ncw.jpg
> 
> After:
> http://www.picbutler.de/bild/321321/201503310000023132yrhe.jpg
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Laszlo Kis-Adam
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20150401/61937295/attachment-0001.html>