Review Request 120086: Fix cursorSpellingNameRange range for out-of-line functions.

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Sun Sep 7 14:31:45 UTC 2014


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/#review65998
-----------------------------------------------------------



tests/files/functiondefinitiondeclarations.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/#comment46078>

    this looks like an unrelated change, no?
    
    i.e. keep this here and if at all copy it also to below. furthermore, add a test function that is called
    
        SomeClass::operatorFoo();
    
    and ensure the range of it is create properly.


- Milian Wolff


On Sept. 7, 2014, 6:20 a.m., Sergey Kalinichev wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 7, 2014, 6:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdev-clang
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This was accidentally broken by:
> f17866db1bc24c198e87c028065796959f6dd135
> Author: Kevin Funk <kfunk at kde.org>
> Date:   Mon Aug 4 16:53:06 2014 +0200
> 
>     Also fix ranges for operator functions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   duchain/clanghelpers.cpp fb69a66 
>   tests/files/functiondefinitiondeclarations.cpp fe4050e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sergey Kalinichev
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20140907/585bd7f0/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list