Review Request 120086: Fix cursorSpellingNameRange range for out-of-line functions.
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Sun Sep 7 14:31:45 UTC 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/#review65998
-----------------------------------------------------------
tests/files/functiondefinitiondeclarations.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/#comment46078>
this looks like an unrelated change, no?
i.e. keep this here and if at all copy it also to below. furthermore, add a test function that is called
SomeClass::operatorFoo();
and ensure the range of it is create properly.
- Milian Wolff
On Sept. 7, 2014, 6:20 a.m., Sergey Kalinichev wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 7, 2014, 6:20 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Repository: kdev-clang
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This was accidentally broken by:
> f17866db1bc24c198e87c028065796959f6dd135
> Author: Kevin Funk <kfunk at kde.org>
> Date: Mon Aug 4 16:53:06 2014 +0200
>
> Also fix ranges for operator functions
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> duchain/clanghelpers.cpp fb69a66
> tests/files/functiondefinitiondeclarations.cpp fe4050e
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120086/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> All tests pass.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sergey Kalinichev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20140907/585bd7f0/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list