Review Request 118596: Recognize QML slots and register them as uses of their corresponding signal

Sven Brauch svenbrauch at googlemail.com
Fri Jun 6 17:18:57 UTC 2014


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118596/#review59469
-----------------------------------------------------------


It seems slightly backwards to first do the check for all queries and then filter out those where the match doesn't matter. What is the problem with a function which finds either foo or onFoo and which is only called in the places where you actually want that?

- Sven Brauch


On June 6, 2014, 2:23 p.m., Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118596/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 6, 2014, 2:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdev-qmljs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When the declaration corresponding to a name is being looked for, and the name is "onXXX", declarations named "XXX" are also returned if they are signals. This allows UseBuilder to register "onClicked" as being an use of the "clicked" signal.
> 
> This patch is very general and modifies directly getDeclaration(). This has the advantage that the search logic can be used everywhere (for instance, DeclarationBuilder will soon be able to expose the parameters of a signal to its slot), but getDeclarations() must be very careful not to return an unexpected declaration. For instance, if the user, in a Javascript file, declares an "line" variable, "online" must not be an use of "line". This is done by ensuring that the returned declaration, when "on" has been stripped, is a QML signal.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   duchain/helper.cpp 27f5dd4 
>   tests/files/plugins.qml 428955c 
>   tests/files/uses.js b528344 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118596/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Two unit tests have been added: one ensures that "onDataChanged" is an use of "dataChanged", and one ensures that "online" is not an use of "line" in Javascript.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Denis Steckelmacher
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20140606/73dbf7ee/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list