Review Request 108528: Fix priority problem with rescheduled files on project open

[Milian Wolff]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108528/#review25909
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Fine with me, but please explain why it's needed in the commit message. Also, can you ensure it never goes above the worst priority?

- Milian Wolff


On Jan. 21, 2013, 3:24 p.m., Niko Sams wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108528/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 21, 2013, 3:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Don't use a fixed priority when rescheduling, instead use slight worse than current.
> 
> depends on:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108527
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   phpparsejob.cpp 682f04d 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108528/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Niko Sams
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20130121/674e4161/attachment.html>