Review Request 114466: Remove noisy compiler warnings
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Sun Dec 15 18:18:30 UTC 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/#review45727
-----------------------------------------------------------
languages/cpp/cppduchain/templatedeclaration.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/#comment32662>
is the KDevelop:: qualification required here? If not, please remove it.
projectmanagers/cmake/cmakeutils.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/#comment32663>
While at it, please add whitespaces around the = operator.
projectmanagers/cmake/tests/testhelpers.h
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/#comment32664>
In a test, I'd say use QVERIFY instead of Q_ASSERT - or is this used outside of test functions, i.e. in non-void returning helper functions?
If QVERIFY doesn't work, maybe check for it and QFATAL or similar explicitly - we want to test to fail even in release mode after all.
projectmanagers/custom-buildsystem/custombuildsystemconfigwidget.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/#comment32665>
this will now fail to compile as hasAnyConfigurations is not declared here yet.
- Milian Wolff
On Dec. 14, 2013, 8:37 p.m., lycantrophe li wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 14, 2013, 8:37 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Bugs: Warnings
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=Warnings
>
>
> Repository: kdevelop
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Some small fixes that removes some compiler warnings.
>
> Some warnings only appear when building for release when asserts gets defined or optimized outs, leaving variables passed to them unused. Commit 97f5869 explicitly flags some of these with Q_UNUSED silencing the warning and telling contributers that it is only there to make reading and asserting easier.
>
> Commit 5a4f06a silences some virtual-overload compiler warnings by explicitly saying that we want the parent's visit-methods available. This is augmented by adding the override identifier to the overriden methods, which is consistent with the transition to C++11.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> projectmanagers/custom-buildsystem/custombuildsystemconfigwidget.cpp 042d523
> projectmanagers/cmake/cmakeutils.cpp 9aa22ca
> projectmanagers/cmake/tests/testhelpers.h 5cf552c
> languages/cpp/cppduchain/cppducontext.h fdbe165
> languages/cpp/cppduchain/templatedeclaration.cpp 6b48b7a
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114466/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Ran unit tests. 97f5869 does not alter any code that does work. 5a4f06a only makes explicit what used to be implicit.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> lycantrophe li
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20131215/24fb059d/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list