Static analysis results for Kdevelop & Kdevplatform
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Thu Oct 4 21:58:41 UTC 2012
On Thursday 27 September 2012 22:52:23 André Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At work we have been playing around with Clang static analyzer and
> cppcheck lately so I thought I'll run those tools on the code of my
> favorite IDE :) Here are the results if anyone is interested:
>
> http://steinsoft.net/misc/kdev/cppcheck-kdevelop/
> http://steinsoft.net/misc/kdev/cppcheck-kdevplatform/
> http://steinsoft.net/misc/kdev/kdevelop-scan-build-2012-09-27-2/
> http://steinsoft.net/misc/kdev/kdevplatform-scan-build-2012-09-27-1/
>
> Especially Cppcheck found some issues which might be serious and should
> be looked after (reference to temporary). The runs have been made using
> the newest versions which are available in the repositories (Clang 3.1
> and CppCheck 1.56).
Thanks for that. I've looked at the red warnings and all but one look like
false-positives :(
Though I think we could use a cleanup and fix most of the other notices. Esp.
removing dead code always sounds good to me!
Cheers
--
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20121004/66cc95b1/attachment.sig>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list