Review Request: Make C macro variadic argument optional

[Milian Wolff]

> On June 20, 2012, 1:52 p.m., Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > FYI 8 of the tests in testPreprocessor() were failing before this patch. The test added also fails because variadic arguments are not correctly expanded in the first place.

locally I don't have any failing tests - so please take a look at that again.


- Milian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105307/#review14911
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 20, 2012, 1:51 p.m., Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105307/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2012, 1:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In GNU C, the variadic argument of a macro can be completely left out
> without triggering an error (as explained in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   languages/cpp/parser/rpp/pp-engine.cpp ca566cb 
>   languages/cpp/parser/tests/test_parser.cpp 804f379 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105307/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Checked that the faulty case was not triggering a parsing error anymore. Checked that no regression was introduced in the testPreprocessor() test case.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexandre Courbot
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120625/e45d4f25/attachment.html>