Review Request: add support for Okteta 0.9

[Friedrich W. H. Kossebau]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105211/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for KDevelop.


Description
-------

Of course the upcoming Okteta 0.9 again has a different API, so the Okteta plugin will not be build with it. Unless this patch is committed :)

Needs at least kdesdk from svn commit 1299667. The SC 4.9 beta2 tarballs, unless rerolled, miss an installed header, so if relying on packages, the only upcoming beta3/rc1 packages are needed.

Backport to 4.3 currently blocked by the messed 4.3 branch, but might be a simple cherry-pick. Okay to also backport and commit, once the 4.3 branch is cleared again? Backport with or without the one string addition?


Diffs
-----

  cmake/modules/FindLibKasten.cmake 087eedc 
  cmake/modules/FindLibOktetaKasten.cmake 973f0f1 
  utils/CMakeLists.txt 1545d8c 
  utils/okteta/kastentoolviewwidget.cpp b10974e 
  utils/okteta/kdevokteta.rc e5314cf 
  utils/okteta/oktetadocument.h 56eba46 
  utils/okteta/oktetadocument.cpp abb047d 
  utils/okteta/oktetaglobal.h 0113bbb 
  utils/okteta/oktetaplugin.h 3eec9f7 
  utils/okteta/oktetaplugin.cpp c8a7fd4 
  utils/okteta/oktetatoolviewfactory.cpp ed0cf13 
  utils/okteta/oktetaview.h 29a6b39 
  utils/okteta/oktetaview.cpp 249aaaa 
  utils/okteta/oktetawidget.h dfc9907 
  utils/okteta/oktetawidget.cpp 0fac371 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105211/diff/


Testing
-------

Opened a few files as byte arrays, edited and changed view profiles.


Thanks,

Friedrich W. H. Kossebau

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120611/28d71712/attachment.html>