Review Request: Correctly set completion properties for enumerators

[Olivier Jean de Gaalon]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105616/#review16112
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Sounds like progress to me.

- Olivier Jean de Gaalon


On July 19, 2012, 7:42 a.m., Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105616/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 19, 2012, 7:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> EnumeratorType is rather a variable (compile-time integral constant) than an enum type-name, so mark it accordingly.
> QUESTION: although this is valid for C/C++, are there any places where an EnumeratorType would represent something different?
> 
> // this alone won't fix any bugs, there is a dependent change in queue
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   language/duchain/duchainutils.cpp 1879540 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105616/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Existing unit-tests pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan Shapovalov
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120719/6a715e03/attachment.html>