Dependencies of parse-jobs
svenbrauch at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 13 15:06:18 UTC 2012
yes, I guess it's something like that too (race-condition or similar).
However I thought I could reproduce this with only one parser-thread
too... not sure.
I'll try forcing the parse-job to run immediately after an include is
encountered, thus delaying its parent; I wanted to avoid this, as I
think it'll really increase memory consumption. But if that's the only
way to make it work correctly, that'll have to do :)
I'll report back to you as soon as I can see whether this works or not.
Am 13. Februar 2012 10:54 schrieb David Nolden <zwabel at googlemail.com>:
> 2012/2/12 Sven Brauch <svenbrauch at googlemail.com>:
>> Hi there,
>> PovAddict and I were tracking a bug (in the python plugin) a few days
>> ago which turned out to be caused by the order in which documents are
>> parsed to be wrong (as in, not like I wanted it to be, heh).
>> Currently, I'm doing this: If document A is parsed and an "import"
>> (same like #include in c++) is encountered, a parse job is created for
>> the imported document using
>> with a priority that has a lower value than the current parse job (and
>> thus a higher priority (who invented this?)). Then the current
> This one was my fault, I followed the linux priority logic, which
> later showed to suck hard. :-)
>> document is marked as "needs update", and after the parse job
>> finished, it's registered for a re-parse again (that's done inside
>> parsejob::run) with a lower priority than it had before (I'll use the
>> word "priority" as everybody expects it to be used from now on):
>> Now, that roughly works, but not quite; sometimes, the documents are
>> not parsed exactly in the order their priorities suggests. I guess
>> that is to be expected -- but what else is there except priorities
>> that can be used to "sort" parse jobs?
>> Here's the TL;DR version: What's the "good" way of forcing document A
>> to be re-parsed as soon as there's a top-context for B available which
>> satisfies the required $minimum_features? How does C++ do this? I
>> looked into the code, but couldn't quite find anything related to that
>> (it's a huge project...).
>> Any help would be appreciated. :)
> In C++, included documents may depend on other documents included
> earlier, and thus they must be parsed right in-place.
> You could do the same, by simply creating a new parse-job in-place and
> starting it recursively. You just need to care about preventing
> infinite recursion and multiple running parse-jobs für the same
> document. The question is what would be the correct way to deal with
> such recursion.
> In a language where such recursion is allowed, the correct solution
> would probably be a multi-pass parsing: When you encounter an include,
> parse it in a "simplified" mode (just creating declarations for the
> symbol-table, but without building uses and/or types etc.), and later
> re-parse it in full mode after the "simplified" mode has been finished
> for all includes.
> Greetings, David
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
More information about the KDevelop-devel