Unit testing (once again)

[Miha Čančula]

2012/2/7 Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org>

> **
> Hi Miha!
>
> First of all, I'm happy you're committed to taking over the Unit Test
> framework, it's something we really need! :)
>
>
>
> In my opinion it shouldn't be linked to the project manager, but a
> different interface that the project manager might implement. (think of
> python or ruby projects). What I'd do is something like we do in VCS, where
> you identify a provider for the project who reports the relevant cases.
>
Ok, I'll take a longer look at that. But I agree it should be something
like that.

>
>
> A provider can be ctest for cmake (it can be implemented by the project
> itself) but you can have different ones for qmake or python projects. A
> test entry would be some executable+arguments pair to be run.
>
That's what I had in mind.

@henry: Yes, I'm trying to do just that, the possibility of different test
providers with the same UI.

>
>
> Do you guys think it makes sense? :P
>
> Aleix
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120208/5c5f74de/attachment.html>