Review Request: [17/18] Finally refactor main UI

[Andreas Pakulat]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/#review17285
-----------------------------------------------------------


Hi,

since the two-weeks review period for the plugin are over already I've decided to merge the code into kdevelop. The history has been kept, so it should be possible to re-apply your and my patches from the branch to kdevelop after adjusting the target-path. I'll take care of that once I get around to continue looking into the ui-changes, didn't get to that on the weekend unfortunately.

- Andreas Pakulat


On Aug. 9, 2012, 12:36 p.m., Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 9, 2012, 12:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop and Andreas Pakulat.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changes done:
> 1) Pass current project to the UI and pathes model.
> -> reasoning: they use it to relativize URLs
> 2) last-item-placeholders in pathes- and includes-model replaced by add*() methods
> -> reasoning: UI will use URL requesters to add new items
> 3) add a persistent (undeleteable; attempts to change its path result in creation of another item) "project root" item to the pathes model
> -> reasoning: usability - many people will want to do common per-project settings
> 4) make project pathes model URL-aware: clean/relativize pathes on adding, introduce custom roles to get full pathes/URLs
> -> reasoning: usability
> 
> UI modifications done:
> 5) replace listview of sub-project pathes with a combobox URL requester
> -> reasoning: less on-screen space
> 6) Replace stacked widget for includes/defines selection with a tab-interface.
> -> reasoning: usability - one can see all choices (includes and defines, maybe language features when they are merged) at once instead of having to open the combobox.
> 7) Use URL requesters and add/remove buttons instead of "Double-Click here..." placeholders.
> -> reasoning: usability - one may select a path without having to type it.
> 8) Add a button to remove selected include/define
> -> reasoning: in comments
> 9) Change various labels and popup texts
> -> reasoning: on-screen readability.
> 10) Clear inner UI on config set rather than before config loading.
> -> reasoning: robustness (when new configuration is selected, UI is cleared and refilled from scratch instead of overwriting old data).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configwidget.h ce9ba32 
>   configwidget.cpp 38bc551 
>   configwidget.ui d411d83 
>   custombuildsystemconfig.h 62901d4 
>   custombuildsystemconfigwidget.h d94e9fc 
>   custombuildsystemconfigwidget.cpp 791b7c7 
>   includesmodel.h debf278 
>   includesmodel.cpp ab42e16 
>   kcm_custombuildsystem.cpp 2f222bf 
>   projectpathsmodel.h d32bb92 
>   projectpathsmodel.cpp 6ee35b7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing.
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Before changes
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/654/
> New UI - idle
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/655/
> New UI - editing project path
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/656/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan Shapovalov
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120812/f4f434fb/attachment.html>