Review Request: Allow to pass multiple targets and build variables to the make builder
Alexandre Courbot
gnurou at gmail.com
Sun Apr 15 07:46:33 UTC 2012
> On April 13, 2012, 9:27 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
> > projectbuilders/makebuilder/imakebuilder.h, line 26
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104537/diff/2/?file=56290#file56290line26>
> >
> > hm a QMap will implicitly sort the variables, that might not be desired. i.e. if you want to have
> >
> > make FOO=bar ASDF=asdf
> >
> > you will actually get
> >
> > make ASDF=asdf FOO=bar
> >
> > instead it might be better to just go for a QStringList of arguments, which would also allow stuff like
> >
> > make FOO BAR
> >
> > (i.e. not A=B but just A B)
>
> Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> These are variables, not no targets - their order do not matter, as they are just going to prevent same-name variables from being defined in the Makefile.
>
> http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/make-3.79.1/html_chapter/make_9.html#SEC90
>
> And as the same document says, the use of '=' is what differentiates a variable from a target in the command line. In your last example, FOO and BAR are targets, not variables. The order of targets does matter, but they already use a QStringList.
>
> So apart from a cosmetic point of view (QMap<QString, QString> might not be so elegant to have around, maybe a typedef would be better?), it seems to me that QMap is totally adequate here.
>
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> I agree with Alexandre, a quick test shows that variables on the commandline cannot reference each other so the order is completely irrelevant. In such a case a QMap is ok I believe and makes it easier to handle addition/removal. It should also be fast enough since there are not many variables set usually.
>
> Milian Wolff wrote:
> well, then this is OK with me
>
> Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> I will just add a typedef to make things easier to read.
As pointed out by Wolfgang on the list:
They do if you happen to set the same variable twice:
make X=abc X=def
will produce different results than
make X=def X=abc
So I will change that to a list of string pairs.
- Alexandre
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104537/#review12409
-----------------------------------------------------------
On April 11, 2012, 2:13 a.m., Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104537/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 11, 2012, 2:13 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This change augments the IMakeBuilder interface and MakeBuilder class to let them support the following:
>
> 1) Let make be run with multiple targets to build in one run
> 2) Pass build variables as a QMap of (variable, value) pairs that are also passed to make's command line.
>
> E.g. this change now makes it possible for the make builder to perform make invokations that look like the following (example taken from an actual Linux kernel build):
>
> $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/bin/arm-elf- vmlinux modules
>
> API compatibility is not broken, but ABI is as the former virtual method of IMakeBuilder is now an inline function.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> projectbuilders/makebuilder/imakebuilder.h 56735425d78551883f109e942145eba2aa982687
> projectbuilders/makebuilder/makebuilder.h 34881c6eaee775b6b8b53959dfcf825732e806da
> projectbuilders/makebuilder/makebuilder.cpp 6c6905db30f469958f4a0048826febea29bad15a
> projectbuilders/makebuilder/makejob.h 19032fdf371da793d52b3457e5aa78a6b8458150
> projectbuilders/makebuilder/makejob.cpp ad5636dbfdadf3ae18ad1cc5b8dff078dd34cd42
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104537/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Ensured API remained compatible and prior API behaved identically, tested build variables with the kdev-kernel plugin that uses them.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexandre Courbot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120415/3bbcbb27/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list