Review Request: Add possibility to declare a local declaration as type "auto"

[Jonas Jacobi]

> On Sept. 16, 2011, 8:45 a.m., David Nolden wrote:
> > The problem is that it clutters up the assistant-options, see your screenshot, the text doesn't fit the window any more.
> > 
> > I think a more useful assistant regarding "auto" would be the other way around: Transform an "auto" into a real type declaration.

That one would be good, too.
But i think you are right in the sense that the current layout looks a bit cluttered.
But, wouldn't a better solution - instead of restricting the amount of options (in the screenshot it's only 4) - be to have e.g. a vertical layout for the options?


- Jonas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102615/#review6548
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 15, 2011, 7:58 p.m., Jonas Jacobi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102615/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 15, 2011, 7:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Additional possibility in the MissingDeclarationAssistant to declare a local declaration as type "auto" for C++11.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/missingdeclarationassistant.cpp bafc159 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102615/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Declare a variable of type auto
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102615/s/260/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonas
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110916/0049a640/attachment.html>