C++0x support macros

[Esben Mose Hansen]

On Monday 30 May 2011 18:19:06 Aleix Pol wrote:
> Apparently the "auto" keyword (not standard before?) changed meaning, but
>  otherwise it should all more or less work with code written for the old
>  standard. Great :)

The auto meant "automatic variable", created on the stack You can still write 

   void foo() {
     auto int x;
   }

which would mean exactly the same as without auto. Once upon a time, this was 
cutting edge tech, to be approached with caution and reverence. Thus, auto has 
been a reserved keyword since the dawn of C.

On subject, while it might make sense to be able to flag whether a project (I 
presume) is to be compiled for the new C++11 or the old C++93, and even be 
useful, it probably *is* a bit tricky and might not be worth it. If it is 
done, it should probably be read from the build system.

-- 
Kind regards, Esben